Mass. residents fighting to reclaim money from city in 'equity theft' lawsuit (2024)

SAVINGS BACK. IT’S A REALLY WONDERFUL RESOURCE FOR THE COMMUNITY. THESE WOODS AND THIS HOUSE USED TO BELONG TO A MAN NAMED STEVEN WOODBRIDGE. AROUND 2019, HE STARTED TO HAVE FINANCIAL PROBLEMS WITH THE TOWN’S. STEVEN FELL BEHIND ON HIS TAXES, TOTALING $5,700. WITH INTEREST IN FEES, HIS DEBT INCREASED TO 54,000, WHICH HE COULDN’T PAY. IN 2019, THE CITY OF GREENFIELD FORECLOSED ON HIS HOME AND 19 ACRES OF HIS LAND. THE CITY THEN SOLD HIS HOME AND SOME OF THE LAND. FOR $270,000, AND KEPT THE PROFIT OF MORE THAN $200,000. IT WAS HIS EQUITY. HE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE IT IN THE BANK. IT WAS ALL IN THAT HOUSE. GONE. YEAH, GONE. IN ONE MORNING. GONE. ACTIVIST AL NORMAN HAS BEEN FIGHTING THIS PROCESS KNOWN AS EQUITY THEFT, HERE IN GREENFIELD FOR YEARS. I HAD SOME NEIGHBORS COME TO ME AND SAY, AL, THEY’RE TAKING OUR HOME. THEY WANT ALL OF OUR MONEY. EVERY SINGLE PENNY THAT WE HAVE IN OUR HOUSE, WHICH IS MORTGAGE FREE. WE PAID IT OFF. THEY WANT EVERY PENNY. AL HELPED HIS NEIGHBORS RETAIN A LAWYER, PAY OFF WHAT THEY OWED, AND KEEP THEIR HOME. BUT THAT EXPERIENCE MADE HIM WONDER HOW MANY OTHER RESIDENTS HAD LOST EVERYTHING. AND COULD HE HELP THEM TOO? THEN LAST YEAR, AFTER THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RULED UNANIMOUSLY, IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR CITIES AND TOWNS TO FORECLOSE ON A HOME AND SELL IT AND POCKET THE PROFITS. AL PUT A NOTICE IN HIS LOCAL NEWSPAPER. IT SAYS, SEARCHING FOR FORMER CITY PROPERTY OWNERS WHO MAY BE OWED MONEY. IF ANYBODY KNOWS THE WHEREABOUTS OF THESE PEOPLE, BE IN TOUCH WITH US. THAT’S HOW WE FOUND STEVEN WOODBRIDGE AND ROBERTA BROWNING, WHO LIVED AT THIS HOME. ROBERTA FELL BEHIND ON HER TAXES BY $1,500. THAT INCREASE TO $15,000 WITH INTEREST AND FEES, THE CITY FORECLOSED, SOLD HER HOME AND KEPT THE PROFITS. AL TALKED. STEVEN AND ROBERTA, WHO BOTH DECLINED TO BE INTERVIEWED FOR THIS STORY, INTO TAKING LEGAL ACTION TO GET BACK THEIR LIFE SAVINGS, AND HE CONNECTED THEM WITH ATTORNEY MICHAEL ALEO. THIS IS ABOUT THE FIFTH AMENDMENT, THE FIFTH AMENDMENT SAYS THAT GOVERNMENT IS NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION. THEY FILED THIS FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY OF GREENFIELD, DEMANDING THE CITY PAY THEM FOR THEIR HOMES. MR. WOODBRIDGE’S PROPERTY WAS TAKEN. IT WAS WORTH MULTIPLES OF WHAT HE OWED THE CITY. ROBERTA BROWNING’S PROPERTY WAS TAKEN. IT WAS WORTH MULTIPLES OF WHAT SHE OWED THE CITY. THE CITY SHOULD PAY MR. WOODBRIDGE AND SHOULD PAY MISS BROWNING THAT SURPLUS AMOUNT THE CITY OF GREENFIELD FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS THE LAWSUIT. THE JUDGE HAS YET TO RULE ON THAT. CITY OFFICIALS DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR REQUESTS FOR A COMMENT. IF THE LAWSUIT IS SUCCESSFUL, THE HOPE IS IT COULD HAVE RAMIFICATIONS FAR BEYOND GREENFIELD THE MUNICIPALITIES ACROSS THE COMMONWEALTH WOULD ALMOST CERTAINLY OWE EXCESS OF MULTIPLE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. I HAVE NO DOUBT AT ALL THAT IT’S JUST A MATTER OF TIME THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO SEE PEOPLE LINING UP TO FILE CLAIMS AND GETTING THEIR MONEY BACK. NOW, WHILE STEVEN AND ROBERTA WAIT FOR A JUDGE TO RULE ON THEIR CASE, SEVERAL BILLS TO FIX THE LAW IN MASSACHUSETTS ARE STALLED ON BEACON HILL, WAITING FOR ACTION FROM THE STATE LEGISLATURE.

Advertisem*nt

Mass. residents fighting to reclaim money from city in 'equity theft' lawsuit

Two Greenfield residents are fighting to reclaim hundreds of thousands of dollars in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit that could have impacts across Massachusetts.

Two Greenfield residents are fighting to get back what the city has taken from them in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit that, if successful, could also put millions of dollars back in the pockets of residents across Massachusetts.The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that the two residents, Stephen Woodbridge and Roberta Browning, fell behind on their taxes. The city of Greenfield then foreclosed on the residents' homes, sold their properties, and kept the profits beyond what they owed.It's a practice known as equity theft, and 5 Investigates' Karen Anderson has been exposing the impact for almost a year since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional last spring. In Stephen Woodbridge's case, he fell behind approximately $5,700 in taxes. With interest and fees, his debt increased to $54,000, which he couldn't pay. In 2019, Greenfield foreclosed on his home and 19 acres of his land. The city then sold the home and 13 acres of the land for $270,000, and kept the roughly $215,000 in excess profit. The city kept six of the acres for public trails."It was his equity, he didn't even have it in the bank. It was all in that house. And basically, he was left without any income at all," said local activist Al Norman. "In one morning, gone."Norman has been fighting against equity theft in Greenfield for years."I had some neighbors come to me and say, 'Al, they're taking our home,'" he said. "They want all of our money, every single penny that we have in our house, which is mortgage-free, we've paid it off."Norman helped his neighbors retain a lawyer, pay off what they owed, and keep their home. But that experience made him wonder, how many other residents had lost everything? Could he help them, too?Then last year, after the Supreme Court's ruling, he put a notice in his local newspaper searching for former property owners who may be owed money.That's how he found Woodbridge and another resident named Roberta Browning. Browning had fallen behind on her taxes by $1,500, which increased to $15,000 with interest and fees. The city foreclosed, sold her home for $34,000, and kept the profits. Browning alleges the sale price was below market value; her home was then sold again less than two years later for $272,000.Norman talked Woodbridge and Browning, who both declined to be interviewed for this story, into taking legal action to get back their life savings and connected them with attorney Michael Aleo."This is about the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment says that government is not allowed to take private property without just compensation," Aleo said.They filed a federal lawsuit against Greenfield, demanding the city pay them for their homes."Mr. Woodbridge's property was taken, it was worth multiples of what he owed. Roberta Browning's property was taken. It was worth multiples of what she owed the city," Aleo said. "The city should pay Mr. Woodbridge and should pay Ms. Browning that surplus amount. That's what just compensation means, and that's what they are due."The city of Greenfield filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which a judge has yet to rule on. City officials did not respond to our requests for comment.If the lawsuit is successful, Norman and Aleo believe it could have ramifications far beyond Greenfield."Municipalities across the Commonwealth would almost certainly owe excess of multiple millions of dollars," Aleo said in reference to other cities and towns who have participated in the same practice."I have no doubt at all that it's just a matter of time that we will be able to see people lining up to file claims and getting their money back," Norman said.While Woodbridge and Browning wait for a judge to rule on their case, a Massachusetts Supreme Court judge ruled last week the state's current law to be unconstitutional. Several bills to fix the law have been filed Beacon Hill, waiting for action from the legislature.

GREENFIELD, Mass. —

Two Greenfield residents are fighting to get back what the city has taken from them in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit that, if successful, could also put millions of dollars back in the pockets of residents across Massachusetts.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that the two residents, Stephen Woodbridge and Roberta Browning, fell behind on their taxes. The city of Greenfield then foreclosed on the residents' homes, sold their properties, and kept the profits beyond what they owed.

Advertisem*nt

It's a practice known as equity theft, and 5 Investigates' Karen Anderson has been exposing the impact for almost a year since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional last spring.

In Stephen Woodbridge's case, he fell behind approximately $5,700 in taxes. With interest and fees, his debt increased to $54,000, which he couldn't pay. In 2019, Greenfield foreclosed on his home and 19 acres of his land. The city then sold the home and 13 acres of the land for $270,000, and kept the roughly $215,000 in excess profit. The city kept six of the acres for public trails.

"It was his equity, he didn't even have it in the bank. It was all in that house. And basically, he was left without any income at all," said local activist Al Norman. "In one morning, gone."

Norman has been fighting against equity theft in Greenfield for years.

"I had some neighbors come to me and say, 'Al, they're taking our home,'" he said. "They want all of our money, every single penny that we have in our house, which is mortgage-free, we've paid it off."

Norman helped his neighbors retain a lawyer, pay off what they owed, and keep their home. But that experience made him wonder, how many other residents had lost everything? Could he help them, too?

Then last year, after the Supreme Court's ruling, he put a notice in his local newspaper searching for former property owners who may be owed money.

That's how he found Woodbridge and another resident named Roberta Browning. Browning had fallen behind on her taxes by $1,500, which increased to $15,000 with interest and fees. The city foreclosed, sold her home for $34,000, and kept the profits. Browning alleges the sale price was below market value; her home was then sold again less than two years later for $272,000.

Mass. residents fighting to reclaim money from city in 'equity theft' lawsuit (1)

Hearst Owned

Norman talked Woodbridge and Browning, who both declined to be interviewed for this story, into taking legal action to get back their life savings and connected them with attorney Michael Aleo.

"This is about the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment says that government is not allowed to take private property without just compensation," Aleo said.

They filed a federal lawsuit against Greenfield, demanding the city pay them for their homes.

"Mr. Woodbridge's property was taken, it was worth multiples of what he owed. Roberta Browning's property was taken. It was worth multiples of what she owed the city," Aleo said. "The city should pay Mr. Woodbridge and should pay Ms. Browning that surplus amount. That's what just compensation means, and that's what they are due."

The city of Greenfield filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which a judge has yet to rule on. City officials did not respond to our requests for comment.

If the lawsuit is successful, Norman and Aleo believe it could have ramifications far beyond Greenfield.

"Municipalities across the Commonwealth would almost certainly owe excess of multiple millions of dollars," Aleo said in reference to other cities and towns who have participated in the same practice.

"I have no doubt at all that it's just a matter of time that we will be able to see people lining up to file claims and getting their money back," Norman said.

While Woodbridge and Browning wait for a judge to rule on their case, a Massachusetts Supreme Court judge ruled last week the state's current law to be unconstitutional. Several bills to fix the law have been filed Beacon Hill, waiting for action from the legislature.

Judge finds 'equity theft' law unconstitutional, pressuring Massachusetts lawmakers to act

Mass. residents fighting to reclaim money from city in 'equity theft' lawsuit (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gregorio Kreiger

Last Updated:

Views: 6439

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gregorio Kreiger

Birthday: 1994-12-18

Address: 89212 Tracey Ramp, Sunside, MT 08453-0951

Phone: +9014805370218

Job: Customer Designer

Hobby: Mountain biking, Orienteering, Hiking, Sewing, Backpacking, Mushroom hunting, Backpacking

Introduction: My name is Gregorio Kreiger, I am a tender, brainy, enthusiastic, combative, agreeable, gentle, gentle person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.